Twitter bans over 45,000 accounts in India for violating guidelines
Twitter banned more than 45,000 accounts in India in July for violating guidelines, according to the microblogging platform’s monthly compliance report.
The social media giant is currently locked in a legal battle
with the Indian government over content blocking orders. Now, it has already
banned 45,191 accounts of Indian users.
Twitter suspended 42,825 Indian users' accounts for
promoting child sexual exploitation and non-consensual nudity. It blocked
another 2,366 accounts for promoting terrorism, Twitter said in its monthly
compliance report as per the new IT Rules, 2021.
Twitter received 874 grievances in India through its local
grievance mechanism between June 26 to July 25. Subsequently, it took action on
70 complaints. In June 2022, Twitter banned more than 43,140 accounts of Indian
users.
Twitter said in its monthly compliance report, “While we
welcome everyone to express themselves on Twitter, we do not tolerate behaviour
that harasses, threatens, dehumanises, or uses fear to silence the voices of
others.”
According to the new IT Rules 2021, big social media
platforms, with more than 5 million users, have to publish monthly compliance
reports on social media users and their digital content.
According to media reports, Twitter receives complaints on
its Grievance Officer-India channel. Twitter takes important decisions related
to accounting verification and account access through this channel. Twitter can
also take action on account suspensions.
In May this year, the social media giant moved the Karnataka
High Court against the Indian government's order to take down some content on
its micro-blogging platform.
Currently, Twitter is fighting a legal battle with Tesla
founder Elon Musk over his $44 billion deal. Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of
the Delaware Court of Chancery has ordered a five-day trial beginning October
17 to determine whether Musk can buy the social media platform or not.
In June this year, Musk openly accused Twitter of breaching
the merger agreement.
Comments
Post a Comment