Why Does Australia Need Adopt a Magnitsky Like Act?
Australia will acquire a sanction law like the U.S. Magnitsky Act that permits targeted
monetary sanctions and travel boycotts against people who are "culprits of
intolerable acts of global concern", the foreign affairs minister
expressed in August 2021.
A
Magnitsky Act is a kind of enactment that empowers state-run administrations to
force financial sanctions against foreign people or entities who perpetrate or
are engaged with severe human rights violations and corruption overseas.
This
enactment works extra-regionally, forcing fines on people or organizations,
including freezing and demanding resources and travel boycotts, for acts
performed outside the administering nation's jurisdiction.
Australia is on the cusp of passing a Magnitsky Act of their own. When asked by the @smh what the greatest risk was with this legislation, I said “It won’t be used against human rights abusers from powerful countries like China and Russia.” https://t.co/P3kawxgWIS
— Bill Browder (@Billbrowder) May 12, 2020
It gets
its name from US laws established to sanction the people liable for the 2009
demise of Russian legal counsellor Sergei Magnitsky, who uncovered serious tax
theft by several Russian organizations seized from an American lender.
The
global drive behind adopting such laws has been advocated by British activist
Bill Browder. His mission to hold the authorities liable for the demise of
Russian legal counsellor Sergei Magnitsky in 2009 has seen the United Kingdom,
United States, Canada, and the European Union adopt such powers.
This week
the Morrison administration intends to acquaint Magnitsky-styled act with reinforcing
its capacity to sanction foreign people. It will empower legislatures to force
monetary and travel sanctions against foreign nations or organizations engaged
with extreme human rights violations or corruption.
However,
a few human rights organizations and campaigners, like Geoffrey Robertson,
disapprove of the Morrison administration's plans, contending that the methods
aren't zeroed in enough on human rights and fail to embrace the full proposals
of the advisory committee review.
Article
Credit: The
Diplomat/ BBC/ HRW
Comments
Post a Comment